Thursday, March 6, 2008

Racing for the Right Name

The article “From African to African American” written by Simitherman describes how difficult it is to name a race. It seems to me that choosing a name for a race would be quite simple. An important figure of that race denotes a “group name” and moves on. Our history, however, shows that it is much more complicated than this.

Africans in America have had quite a few names from 1619 to present. These names range from “African” to “negro” to “Negro” with a capital “n” to “Colored” to “Black” to “African American.” This list is infinitely long as with all other race names.

Race names should not be based on appearance. The name should not reflect the group’s hair color, facial structure, height, speech, intelligence, or social status. The name should represent the country or state they are from.

The French are from France, Canadians are from Canada, Hawaiians are from Hawaii, and so on. The name given to Africans in America should reflect this pattern and they should be called “Africans” or “African American.” Referring to a race by where they are from instead of their appearance eliminates racism. Above all, race names should possess respect.

It is through the same respect that you address a person by their appropriate ethnic title. For example my friend is Peruvian and people refer to her as Mexican just because they look similar. She sees others’ carelessness very insulting. The majority of people refer to those who are from South America as Mexican. The problem is that not many people know the difference between Mexican, Latino, and Hispanic.

I have seen this happen with my mother on numerous occasions. My mom is Japanese and people will refer to her as Chinese. I find it humorous that many Americans believe that if you look Asian than you are automatically from China. There is clear difference.

Race names will forever be an issue if we continue to choose names based on traits. Respectful names are the only way people can live in harmony.

No comments: